According to lecture, Callicles becomes dishonest in his side of the argument with Socrates when he
declares that the good life is one of fulfilling your every desire.
agrees with Socrates that the superior ruler must first rule themselves.
agrees with Socrates that the superior should rule.
asserts that all pleasures are equally good.
What is a general way to understand the term 'counter-example' as sometimes used in lecture (there may be more than one correct answer)?
One version of a counter-example is a case that shows that a principle held to be universally true (generalized) can have an instance that is false.
One version of a counter-example is a demonstration that an argument can have all true premises and a false conclusion, which shows the argument is invalid.
One version of a counter-example is that it is merely the denial of conclusion that was arrived at via argument, without providing an argument for that denial.
One version of a counter-example is an example of an argument which is etched into a kitchen counter.
In lecture it was suggested that Polus should have attacked 2 of Socrates' premises. What were those premises?